I'm sure the way you feel about something like the gun control debate often has to do with they way you were raised. If you grew up in a huntin' family with a gun collection, you're probably cool with guns. If you didn't, you're probably a little apprehensive of firearms. I definitely fall into the latter category.
I touched an AK-47 today and my insides cringed. Ew! Gross! I had gun germs on me.
I don't think all guns have to be outlawed. I don't want to hunt, but I understand that a lot of people enjoy the hobby. I don't feel the need to protect myself with a pistol, but I understand that many people do.
But - in reference to the weapons ban that expired today - I can't figure out why anyone not in the military or police corps could possibly need a semi-automatic assault rifle.
I've heard the arguments. Collections. Target practice. Because the constitution says I can. I just don't understand the arguments. Why could you possibly need to shoot that much ammunition that quickly from that far away? Why on earth do you need a bayonet on the end of your gun?
I believe in the rights of citizens, but I just don't understand this debate. Maybe it's the way I was raised. Or maybe it's because I don't want the guys down the street to have easier access to assault rifles.
; "Tub 'O Kids")
; "Beloved Totoro")
; "Camille and Nonie")
; "The Graduates")
; "Preschool Graduation")
; "Gardening with Daddy")
; "Gardening with Boo")
; "Gardening")
; "The Camp Princess Holds Court")
; "Tap Dancer")
An online journal chronicling the life of a wife, mom and new media consultant in Savannah, GA....